Skip to main content

Print Advertisement: Nivea Moisturizer

To start off, here's some basic information about the advert. Its target audience is young women, as the main focus of the advert is a young woman, and the product is cosmetic, a product type commonly advertised to this target audience. The cosmetic in question is "Nivea Smooth Milk: Body", a type of moisturizing cream.

As the ad is written in English and comes from a German (Western) company, it can be concluded that this advert comes from a Western cultural background. Since Nivea was founded in 1911, it can be inferred that this ad was made in 2011, due to the quote "100 years skin care for life".

The ad seems to imply that physical attractiveness is the most important factor in a happy relationship, due to the happy couple featured in the image, and the slogan "For visibily smooth and touchably soft skin" (misspellings came with the ad), which seems to imply to the viewer that moisturizer brought the couple closer together (the image has them embracing each other). Obviously, since this is an advert, it emphasises the 'importance' of mosturizing and having smooth skin, which was done by showing the female model's bare back and arm (which were both smooth). In short, physical attractiveness, not personality nor any other aspect of a person, is focused on in this ad.

Despite being both the target audience and the focus of the ad, this ad does not seem to be empowering them. Rather, this ad implies that they are valued for being 'beautiful/perfect', and tries to sell them the product by trying using appeals such as the need for affiliation and need for attention. The personality and other aspect of the woman in the ad is ignored, instead drawing connections from her smooth skin to her relationship status. To me, it seems as if the ad is reducing women down to a single characteristic; beauty. Whether or not this was intentional of the ad is debatable, but it seems that the company's pursuit of getting its target audience (young women) to buy their products, has marginalised them at the same time, reinforcing the need to use cosmetics, as dictated by societal customs (meaning that the need for affiliation in this case, is not limited to the ad). Now, I don't think this is necessarily for malicious reasons, but rather, the company's economic self-interest. By using pathos, they use common insecurities (do I look good?, etc.) to get more to buy their products. This seems to be more of an industry-wide characteristic, and not limited to Nivea.  

Comments

  1. Unknown23 November 2016 at 13:58

    I definitely agree on the advertisement reducing women down to a single characteristic, in which was beauty. The man next to her helped emphasize that point, in which the product's purpose was to make connections on the smooth skin and the couple's relationship status. Directing women to the need of using such cosmetics to attract the opposite sex.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This is Water and Alice Munro Short Stories

Alice Munro’s short stories are usually about women and families from a suburban and or rural setting. She discusses topics such as gender roles and interpersonal relationships, usually from a woman’s perspective. What David Foster Wallace’s theory on education can do with this, is that it allows us, the reader, to adjust our perspective, to be sympathetic to the characters. Although I personally am not a girl growing up in a post-WWII Canadian small town, I can still relate to or at least empathise with the characters and their emotions that Munro has created. In Munro’s stories, her characters tend to have personal flaws or defy the tradition character ideals, for example the narrator in “Boys and Girls”, despite her desire to keep her role helping her father and dislike of the role women are designated for in her family, she ends up subconsciously transforming, until she starts to fit the mould of what her family and society says a woman should be. While we, the audience, may expec...
4 comments
Read more

My Name

My first name, Victor, originates from Latin. It means victor, or conqueror. Its quite a universal name, and is pronounced very similarly in most languages, despite some languages spelling it differently (Viktor). Culturally, it seems to me like the name is more common in 'Latin' countries (France, Italy, Spain, etc.) or Eastern European countries (like Russia), in the form of Viktor, but this is my own personal observation, so it might not be necessarily true. As to how it affects my identity, I don't think it affects it very much. I'm not singled out or anything because of my name (I guess its quite international due to the Latin origin) like the author of that text we read about names in class was. I don't see myself as a conqueror, like my name suggests, but then again, who is a conqueror these days? However, I really dislike losing (who doesn't?), so that has to count for something, right? I guess the international nature of the name could be said to repre...
2 comments
Read more