Passage:
First stream-of-consciousness in chapter 4
This passage shows the reader what
Said Mahran now thinks of his old mentor figure, Rauf Ilwan. In the previous
chapter, Rauf, though cordial in his demeanor to Mahran, rejects his wish to
work as a journalist at his newspaper – due to Mahran’s lack of qualifications,
but gives him some money, and states that “No job is menial, as long as it is
honest”.
In the passage, Said concludes that
Rauf as evolved into someone else and has abandoned and/or betrayed his ideals.
As characteristic of stream of consciousness, this passage operates
non-chronologically, beginning with Mahran’s thoughts on the ‘new Rauf’, and
going through his thought process that brings him to remember how he was betrayed
by Ilish, and ranks them similarly in terms of how he feels they have betrayed
him. The hatred expressed by Said in lines such as “I don’t know which of you
is the most treacherous”, characterises the fixation on the past and vengeance
that he continues to display throughout the story up until his death.This is
also the revelation of Said’s hamartia – his fatal flaw, by Mahfouz, which
would be his ‘raison d’etre’ becoming vengeance on those whom he feels betrayed
him – leading him on an inescapable path that ends with his death.
The thought process that Mahfouz
writes for Said displays much of this hamartia and irrationality. Said
genuinely cannot decide whether or not Ilish is the most treacherous of the pair
– even though it could be argued that Ilish has had by far the most negative
effect on Said’s life (getting him jailed, being romantically involved with his
wife, and as a result of the betrayal, responsible for Sana not remembering
him). The irratic thought process that Said displays is also emphasised with the
use of italics to connote a stream of conscious passage: italics are less
‘solid’ than normal font, therefore the reader associates the stream of
consciousness parts with less stability – which matches Said’s own instable and
irratic thought process.
The use of stream of consciousness by
Mahfouz draws the reader’s attention to the aspects of Said that could be
considered as ‘tragic hero traits’, such as Said’s hamartia, the seeds of his
downfall, and his instability. He also reveals and thus characterises the traits
of other characters in these passages.
Victor's computer won't allow to post comments; his 'killer sentence' is
ReplyDelete"This is also the revelation of Said’s hamartia – his fatal flaw, by Mahfouz, which would be his ‘raison d’etre’ becoming vengeance on those whom he feels betrayed him – leading him on an inescapable path that ends with his death."
"The thought process that Mahfouz writes for Said displays much of this hamartia and irrationality. "
ReplyDeletecan be modified to: "Mahfouz allows the readers to view the stream of consciousness of Said as it acts to characterize Said to become more dimensional character as it illustrates harmatia such as his irrational ideas and decisions."