Skip to main content

Letter to the Editor - The Daily Mail

Dear Ms. Laura Clark,
Your article, while raising a few interesting and worrying points, completely missed the mark. Instead of blasting ‘text speak’ and saying that “Youngsters are also in danger of growing up with limited vocabularies because they spend so much of their free time on sites such as Twitter…”, perhaps you should look to the parents and authority figures who should be teaching the children about the English language before blaming technology. As a ‘youngster’ myself, I feel that you shift the blame on to text speak too much, and give it unfair credit. It is also rather insulting to observe the generation raising us, cast their responsibility on to inanimate devices, that they themselves gave us.
The fact is, is that both teachers and parents share a certain responsibility to teach children to do the right thing. Perhaps the staff should have made a better effort in making sure that the children knew to differentiate their writing styles for different contexts and situations. Instead of blaming text speak, which in my opinion (that I’m sure my fellow ‘youngsters’ share as well), is a rather efficient way to write, especially on those tiny phone keyboards. You should realise that the only reason students are using text speak in their school work is that they have not been properly taught by either their parents or teachers, to write properly. Text speak, while at times grammatically incorrect, was simply something originally created out of necessity. Before the era of the iPhone and Galaxy, people often had to limit the amount of text they used, due to bad phone plans and the complexities of having to use the physical phone keyboard. People still knew the correct spellings and the full words, but they made a conscious choice, either to look ‘cool’ or to be efficient. While your complaints about the decrease in grammar and spelling are valid, isn’t it our job to correct them? Instead of raising a child glued to their phone, perhaps parents and teachers could cooperate in making sure the child has a comprehensive education in grammar, writing, and vocabulary. Children using text speak is only a symptom of a wider problem in our society, more specifically the school system and parenting, in my opinion. Even if text speak has truly eroded our language, shouldn’t schools and parents adapt to the change and try to help students retain some basic knowledge of their own language? Is it too much to ask?
I don’t know what age the people you referenced were, but it sounds like both their parents and teachers have failed them, at least in language skills. ‘Hitler was majorly bad’ is a grammatical mistake that even a  3rd grader (native English speaking) would not make. Which leads me to say: What on Earth happened in elementary? Issues like this should be caught and rectified, not left to fester, and written about in some tabloid! The grammatical errors made by the students, in my opinion, was caused by poor language education, one that even a life with the Amish would not improve. To point the finger at text speak as the cause for the so-called ‘erosion’ of children’s language, is simply a scapegoat for all of our failings on properly teaching this generation about the English language. Next time, make an effort, and look beyond what people are saying. Maybe try actually asking the students why they write like that? I hope to see better quality journalism next time “Daily Mail”, but glancing at the side column on your website, it seems that I shall be hoping and waiting for a long while.
Victor Mauring, 16
Abu Dhabi, UAE 

Comments

  1. It is very interesting that you blamed parents and teachers of the children's use of text speak, as it is in fact their responsibility and fault for the 'erosion' of children's language. Great use of language! This was very enjoyable to read.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ibo Background Assessment

Note: Written from a non-Ibo person perspective, however the person has knowledge of what the Ibo culture is and what their achievements are and is speaking on behalf of it at the Royal Colonial Institute’s annual dinner. Set in the Late Victorian era, as the assignment suggests. Words in-between this: [ ], are explanations of phrases, and would not be said in the actual speech.             Greetings, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Royal Colonial Institute. As you all know, this is a time of great change in this world. In the span of 100 years we’ve gone from walking on foot and horseback, to being able to get to Edinburgh from London in only 8½ hours whilst sitting, in relative comfort. Despite losing America a century ago, the British Empire has grown immensely since then, acquiring massive territories in Africa. Truly, the Sun never sets on the British Empire. But despite your dominance and hegemony over the world, the human cost of the colonies that form your overseas empire has be

This is Water and Alice Munro Short Stories

Alice Munro’s short stories are usually about women and families from a suburban and or rural setting. She discusses topics such as gender roles and interpersonal relationships, usually from a woman’s perspective. What David Foster Wallace’s theory on education can do with this, is that it allows us, the reader, to adjust our perspective, to be sympathetic to the characters. Although I personally am not a girl growing up in a post-WWII Canadian small town, I can still relate to or at least empathise with the characters and their emotions that Munro has created. In Munro’s stories, her characters tend to have personal flaws or defy the tradition character ideals, for example the narrator in “Boys and Girls”, despite her desire to keep her role helping her father and dislike of the role women are designated for in her family, she ends up subconsciously transforming, until she starts to fit the mould of what her family and society says a woman should be. While we, the audience, may expec

Said Mahran Characterisation Blog Post

Passage: First stream-of-consciousness in chapter 4            This passage shows the reader what Said Mahran now thinks of his old mentor figure, Rauf Ilwan. In the previous chapter, Rauf, though cordial in his demeanor to Mahran, rejects his wish to work as a journalist at his newspaper – due to Mahran’s lack of qualifications, but gives him some money, and states that “No job is menial, as long as it is honest”.            In the passage, Said concludes that Rauf as evolved into someone else and has abandoned and/or betrayed his ideals. As characteristic of stream of consciousness, this passage operates non-chronologically, beginning with Mahran’s thoughts on the ‘new Rauf’, and going through his thought process that brings him to remember how he was betrayed by Ilish, and ranks them similarly in terms of how he feels they have betrayed him. The hatred expressed by Said in lines such as “I don’t know which of you is the most treacherous”, characterises the fixation on the p