Skip to main content

Paper 1 Practice: "We Shall Fight on the Beaches" (Winston Churchill)


             Extract from We Shall Fight on the Beaches- Winston Churchill [1]

We have found it necessary to take measures of increasing stringency, not only against enemy aliens and suspicious characters of other nationalities, but also against British subjects who may become a danger or a nuisance should the war be transported to the United Kingdom. I know there are a great many people affected by the orders which we have made who are the passionate enemies of Nazi Germany. I am very sorry for them, but we cannot, at the present time and under the present stress, draw all the distinctions which we should like to do. If parachute landings were attempted and fierce fighting attendant upon them followed, these unfortunate people would be far better out of the way, for their own sakes as well as for ours. There is, however, another class, for which I feel not the slightest sympathy. Parliament has given us the powers to put down Fifth Column activities with a strong hand, and we shall use those powers subject to the supervision and correction of the House, without the slightest hesitation until we are satisfied, and more than satisfied, that this malignancy in our midst has been effectively stamped out.


Turning once again, and this time more generally, to the question of invasion, I would observe that there has never been a period in all these long centuries of which we boast when an absolute guarantee against invasion, still less against serious raids, could have been given to our people. In the days of Napoleon the same wind which would have carried his transports across the Channel might have driven away the blockading fleet. There was always the chance, and it is that chance which has excited and befooled the imaginations of many Continental tyrants. Many are the tales that are told. We are assured that novel methods will be adopted, and when we see the originality of malice, the ingenuity of aggression, which our enemy displays, we may certainly prepare ourselves for every kind of novel stratagem and every kind of brutal and treacherous manoeuvre. I think that no idea is so outlandish that it should not be considered and viewed with a searching, but at the same time, I hope, with a steady eye. We must never forget the solid assurances of sea power and those which belong to air power if it can be locally exercised.

I have, myself, full confidence that if all do their duty, if nothing is neglected, and if the best arrangements are made, as they are being made, we shall prove ourselves once again able to defend our Island home, to ride out the storm of war, and to outlive the menace of tyranny, if necessary for years, if necessary alone.

At any rate, that is what we are going to try to do. That is the resolve of His Majesty's Government every man of them. That is the will of Parliament and the nation.
The British Empire and the French Republic, linked together in their cause and in their need, will defend to the death their native soil, aiding each other like good comrades to the utmost of their strength.

Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail.

We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving,
then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.


[1] Great Britain’s Prime Minister Winston Churchill delivered a speech to the House of Commons on June 4, 1940. Churchill explained that the British effort in World War II was not going well and that a German invasion of Britain was possible. A gifted orator, Churchill knew he must convince the British people that victory would come someday. When Churchill gave his speech, the U.S. had not yet entered World War II. He references his hope that “the New World,” meaning the U.S., would join the war.

           Analysis: The prescribed text is Winston Churchill’s speech to House of Commons (British governmental institution) in June 1940. This text is identifiable as a political speech due to the usage of conventions related to political speech. Churchill, for example, uses inclusive language, such as ‘we’, which acts as a unifier, which works for his goal, as described by the footnote; “…convince the British people that victory would come someday.” The theme of hope is a major component of this text, and could be described as the main goal of this text; to bring hope to the British people. This text uses literary devices to promote a message of British and political unity against the Nazis, while also giving context/justification to the actions taken at the time, and also inspiring hope in the British population.

To begin with, the target audience for this speech, despite it taking place at the House of Commons, is the average British adult. Throughout the text, Churchill constantly uses unifying and inclusive language, such as ‘we’ and ‘our’. This, as the term suggests, works to include the viewer in the war effort being undertaken by the United Kingdom, using language to portray it as a feat accomplished by the effort of the entire country, of all its people, rather than just politicians. By including the whole nation using the language, Churchill is able to cast an image of World War II being a struggle of society and ideology, raising the stakes, bringing it to a level that the average person can relate to. This works well considering the UK was a democracy; in contrast to Germany, which was a fascist dictatorship. Churchill uses harsh and aggressive language against sympathisers and potential traitors, portraying them as a danger to the rest of Britain; “malignancy in our midst” for example, creates imagery of the so-called Fifth Column (meaning those who sympathise with the enemy) as being cancerous to society, due to the use of the term ‘malignancy’. In this case, Churchill is not trying to convince the Nazi sympathisers to change sides, but rather unite the rest of the British people and society against them and Nazi Germany. Churchill also mentions that there never has been a time when Britain’s safety from invasion was completely guaranteed, and claims “There was always the chance”. He draws parallels to a historical figure and time period, Napoleon Bonaparte and the Napoleonic wars, as an example of how this is not the first-time Britain has faced endangerment of invasion. By using a parallel to Napoleon, Winston Churchill is able to instil hope in his audience, as evidently Napoleon was unsuccessful, and so were other “Continental tyrants” (note the use of Continental – most likely exclusive in usage to the UK). The audience is definitively British in identity, when taking these historical and cultural references into account.
           
In addition, in the third paragraph Winston Churchill mentions ‘duty’, in the quote “…if all do their duty, if nothing is neglected, and if the best arrangements are made, as they are being made, we shall prove ourselves once again able to defend our Island home,” This quote is powerful in the sense that Churchill has empowered every able-bodied British citizen, as he says that through their own effort, they can defend their home from invasion. He has now included the British people in the war effort, they are reminded of their essential role; the war has now become less distant of a concept to them.  
           
Secondly, Churchill is justifying the actions taken by his government, in terms of ‘increasing stringency’ as he says. Churchill uses pathos to appeal his point to the people, by appealing to their patriotism. He acknowledges that most people who will be affected by the measures he is trying to justify are “passionate enemies of Nazi Germany”, and states that he feels “very sorry for them”, but uses the threat of Nazi invasion (parachute landings), “enemy aliens”, and suspicious characters of other nationalities, to justify the increased security measures. The language Churchill uses makes it very clear that he does not regard the enemy as people within British society, but rather an external threat, which works in this speech to further unify the nation.
           
Furthermore, a message of hope is seen throughout the text, and is especially evident in the last three paragraphs. In the first of the last three paragraphs, Churchill mentions the government, Parliament, The British Empire, and the French Republic, are “linked together”. Just like other literary devices mentioned earlier, this creates imagery of unity, except this one less individual and more international. It refers to governments rather than people, however, it still preaches the same message of unity. Quotes such as, “aiding each other like good comrades”, is an effective method to get the audience to feel united, even with their international counterparts. Churchill also addresses and acknowledges the looming threat of Germany, in the second-to-last paragraph. “…large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen…” shows honesty with the audience. The fact that Churchill does not attempt to skirt the issue of Germany having control over most of Europe, creates trust from the audience. It makes Churchill’s words more sincere, while also emphasising the urgency of the situation. Finally, the last paragraph, utilises repetition in a very powerful manner. It uses the same basic structure: “we shall fight in…”. Not only does this use inclusive language, it further emphasises unity and hope to the British people. The paragraph creates imagery of Britain being prepared to fight no matter what, in any situation; showing Britain to be a confident, determined, and brave nation. The mention of “…the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue…” brings hope to the audience, as it is something tangible and plausible (logos), the audience knows that if the New World (USA) steps in, it would be a great boost to the war effort. The last sentence of the preceding paragraph, “…shall not flag or fail”, works well with this final paragraph, as it reflects the determination and willpower of Britain to survive against Nazi Germany expressed in the text.
           
The theme of hope is constantly appearing throughout the text, as shown in the previous paragraphs. As mentioned before, giving the UK citizens hope was one of the main goals of this speech, and it utilises quite powerful quotes in order to muster up hope from the audience. The bleak situation, with Germany having taken over most of mainland Europe, and being practically on Britain’s doorstep, necessitates the need for Churchill to give his people hope for the future, which he does through his mention of historical context (giving additional credibility to Britain) and the mention of the ‘New World’. By uniting the nation through his use of language, Churchill brings additional hope to the UK.
           
Churchill uses direct speech to interact with the audience; his speech almost functions as a sort of monologue towards the people. He addresses them personally, and talks as if he is one of them, by using inclusive language, making his points more relatable and perhaps giving him more ethos, as he appears as someone who is part of, rather than apart of the rest of British society. The speech is in a serious tone, fitting, for a serious issue. Churchill, spoke from the point of view of an ordinary citizen while maintaining an authoritative tone. He tells the audience of the situation and what the government is doing about it, and why they are doing it, “We have found it necessary to take measures…”, the audience is not left to decide what to do. Churchill is also clear that he has “full confidence that if all do their duty… we shall prove… able to defend our Island home”, which leaves no room to question what he is saying, with no double-meaning.
          
            It is important and essential to understand the context of this speech, and how powerful it must have been. The world for the average British person would’ve been a very bleak place, with Nazi Germany controlling most of Europe, and seemingly getting ready to invade Great Britain. The situation was bleak enough for the government to take increased security measures against sympathisers. In this speech, it is important to note that Churchill seems to be trying to unite his country against an external threat, justify increased security measures (possible inconvenience for average people), and maintaining hope and determination that the UK’s side would win the war.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ibo Background Assessment

Note: Written from a non-Ibo person perspective, however the person has knowledge of what the Ibo culture is and what their achievements are and is speaking on behalf of it at the Royal Colonial Institute’s annual dinner. Set in the Late Victorian era, as the assignment suggests. Words in-between this: [ ], are explanations of phrases, and would not be said in the actual speech.             Greetings, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Royal Colonial Institute. As you all know, this is a time of great change in this world. In the span of 100 years we’ve gone from walking on foot and horseback, to being able to get to Edinburgh from London in only 8½ hours whilst sitting, in relative comfort. Despite losing America a century ago, the British Empire has grown immensely since then, acquiring massive territories in Africa. Truly, the Sun never sets on the British Empire. But despite your dominance and hegemony over the world, the human cost of the colonies that form your overseas empire has be

This is Water and Alice Munro Short Stories

Alice Munro’s short stories are usually about women and families from a suburban and or rural setting. She discusses topics such as gender roles and interpersonal relationships, usually from a woman’s perspective. What David Foster Wallace’s theory on education can do with this, is that it allows us, the reader, to adjust our perspective, to be sympathetic to the characters. Although I personally am not a girl growing up in a post-WWII Canadian small town, I can still relate to or at least empathise with the characters and their emotions that Munro has created. In Munro’s stories, her characters tend to have personal flaws or defy the tradition character ideals, for example the narrator in “Boys and Girls”, despite her desire to keep her role helping her father and dislike of the role women are designated for in her family, she ends up subconsciously transforming, until she starts to fit the mould of what her family and society says a woman should be. While we, the audience, may expec

Said Mahran Characterisation Blog Post

Passage: First stream-of-consciousness in chapter 4            This passage shows the reader what Said Mahran now thinks of his old mentor figure, Rauf Ilwan. In the previous chapter, Rauf, though cordial in his demeanor to Mahran, rejects his wish to work as a journalist at his newspaper – due to Mahran’s lack of qualifications, but gives him some money, and states that “No job is menial, as long as it is honest”.            In the passage, Said concludes that Rauf as evolved into someone else and has abandoned and/or betrayed his ideals. As characteristic of stream of consciousness, this passage operates non-chronologically, beginning with Mahran’s thoughts on the ‘new Rauf’, and going through his thought process that brings him to remember how he was betrayed by Ilish, and ranks them similarly in terms of how he feels they have betrayed him. The hatred expressed by Said in lines such as “I don’t know which of you is the most treacherous”, characterises the fixation on the p