Skip to main content

"Examine the resurgence of endangered languages in Ireland and New Zealand. In these instances how could language be considered a tool for resistance?"

Percentage of people who said they could speak Irish (Gaelic or Irish Gaelic), in 2011
            As you many know, Ireland was under the rule of Britain for centuries, only gaining independence in the early 20th century. However, by then Irish (also known as Gaelic, or Irish Gaelic) had declined in usage, with only 15% percent speaking it by the time they gained their independence. Even today, Irish as a language is still less commonly used than English, despite the Irish government making large efforts to promote its usage, such as, historically, requiring those who worked in the civil service, such as postal workers, tax collectors, and more (this was later changed). The history between Ireland and the UK has been quite tense, with the centuries of English and British rule, with them discouraging the usage of Irish, and the whole situation with independence and the status of Northern Ireland.
           
            Nowadays, there seems to be much more reduced animosity between Ireland and Northern Ireland and the UK, especially with the end of the Troubles. Irish as a language, according to the image included, is known more commonly in the Republic, rather than Northern Ireland, which is part of the UK. This fits into the idea that the Irish language had a ‘rebirth’ of sorts, spurned by the desire to assert their independence. By distinguishing themselves from English/British culture, it makes them a lot more of a separate and more distinct entity. Since British rule caused the Irish language to lose its prevalence/majority in favour of English, by encouraging people to speak Irish more, it’s like the country is trying to shake of their history of British rule. However, English remains the more dominant language in Ireland, despite the effort by the government. It seems to me that the effort to bring the language back is based on the need to preserve their culture and to distinguish themselves from the British.


            Moving on to Maori, it faces a similar issue in regards to language usage. Only 24% of Maoris can hold a conversation in Maori. However, unlike Ireland, it seems that there has been less conflict between the Maori and the settlers. Until World War 2, most Maoris spoke the language as there first one, but it seems, possibly due to the higher prevalence of learning English and studying at English-speaking institutions, the use of Maori has declined. In the 1980s, Maori leaders began making efforts to revive the language. It seems to me that in this case, it is less about resistance and more about preserving one’s culture. Compared to other native cultures, such as the Aboriginal cultures in Australia and the Native American cultures, I feel that the Maori have been able to retain more of their culture/power, especially since they are around 15% of the population of New Zealand. If it were to be used as a tool of resistance, I would say that by preserving ones culture and not merging in to the English/settler majority culture, they are emphasising that they are different to them, and are a separate people, with their own culture and language, similarly to the Irish, but with a bit of a different historical context. 

Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C4%81ori_language
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_language

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ibo Background Assessment

Note: Written from a non-Ibo person perspective, however the person has knowledge of what the Ibo culture is and what their achievements are and is speaking on behalf of it at the Royal Colonial Institute’s annual dinner. Set in the Late Victorian era, as the assignment suggests. Words in-between this: [ ], are explanations of phrases, and would not be said in the actual speech.             Greetings, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Royal Colonial Institute. As you all know, this is a time of great change in this world. In the span of 100 years we’ve gone from walking on foot and horseback, to being able to get to Edinburgh from London in only 8½ hours whilst sitting, in relative comfort. Despite losing America a century ago, the British Empire has grown immensely since then, acquiring massive territories in Africa. Truly, the Sun never sets on the British Empire. But despite your dominance and hegemony over the world, the human cost of the colonies that form your overseas empire has be
3 comments
Read more

This is Water and Alice Munro Short Stories

Alice Munro’s short stories are usually about women and families from a suburban and or rural setting. She discusses topics such as gender roles and interpersonal relationships, usually from a woman’s perspective. What David Foster Wallace’s theory on education can do with this, is that it allows us, the reader, to adjust our perspective, to be sympathetic to the characters. Although I personally am not a girl growing up in a post-WWII Canadian small town, I can still relate to or at least empathise with the characters and their emotions that Munro has created. In Munro’s stories, her characters tend to have personal flaws or defy the tradition character ideals, for example the narrator in “Boys and Girls”, despite her desire to keep her role helping her father and dislike of the role women are designated for in her family, she ends up subconsciously transforming, until she starts to fit the mould of what her family and society says a woman should be. While we, the audience, may expec
4 comments
Read more

Said Mahran Characterisation Blog Post

Passage: First stream-of-consciousness in chapter 4            This passage shows the reader what Said Mahran now thinks of his old mentor figure, Rauf Ilwan. In the previous chapter, Rauf, though cordial in his demeanor to Mahran, rejects his wish to work as a journalist at his newspaper – due to Mahran’s lack of qualifications, but gives him some money, and states that “No job is menial, as long as it is honest”.            In the passage, Said concludes that Rauf as evolved into someone else and has abandoned and/or betrayed his ideals. As characteristic of stream of consciousness, this passage operates non-chronologically, beginning with Mahran’s thoughts on the ‘new Rauf’, and going through his thought process that brings him to remember how he was betrayed by Ilish, and ranks them similarly in terms of how he feels they have betrayed him. The hatred expressed by Said in lines such as “I don’t know which of you is the most treacherous”, characterises the fixation on the p
2 comments
Read more