Skip to main content

Letter to the Editor - The Daily Mail

Dear Ms. Laura Clark,
Your article, while raising a few interesting and worrying points, completely missed the mark. Instead of blasting ‘text speak’ and saying that “Youngsters are also in danger of growing up with limited vocabularies because they spend so much of their free time on sites such as Twitter…”, perhaps you should look to the parents and authority figures who should be teaching the children about the English language before blaming technology. As a ‘youngster’ myself, I feel that you shift the blame on to text speak too much, and give it unfair credit. It is also rather insulting to observe the generation raising us, cast their responsibility on to inanimate devices, that they themselves gave us.
The fact is, is that both teachers and parents share a certain responsibility to teach children to do the right thing. Perhaps the staff should have made a better effort in making sure that the children knew to differentiate their writing styles for different contexts and situations. Instead of blaming text speak, which in my opinion (that I’m sure my fellow ‘youngsters’ share as well), is a rather efficient way to write, especially on those tiny phone keyboards. You should realise that the only reason students are using text speak in their school work is that they have not been properly taught by either their parents or teachers, to write properly. Text speak, while at times grammatically incorrect, was simply something originally created out of necessity. Before the era of the iPhone and Galaxy, people often had to limit the amount of text they used, due to bad phone plans and the complexities of having to use the physical phone keyboard. People still knew the correct spellings and the full words, but they made a conscious choice, either to look ‘cool’ or to be efficient. While your complaints about the decrease in grammar and spelling are valid, isn’t it our job to correct them? Instead of raising a child glued to their phone, perhaps parents and teachers could cooperate in making sure the child has a comprehensive education in grammar, writing, and vocabulary. Children using text speak is only a symptom of a wider problem in our society, more specifically the school system and parenting, in my opinion. Even if text speak has truly eroded our language, shouldn’t schools and parents adapt to the change and try to help students retain some basic knowledge of their own language? Is it too much to ask?
I don’t know what age the people you referenced were, but it sounds like both their parents and teachers have failed them, at least in language skills. ‘Hitler was majorly bad’ is a grammatical mistake that even a  3rd grader (native English speaking) would not make. Which leads me to say: What on Earth happened in elementary? Issues like this should be caught and rectified, not left to fester, and written about in some tabloid! The grammatical errors made by the students, in my opinion, was caused by poor language education, one that even a life with the Amish would not improve. To point the finger at text speak as the cause for the so-called ‘erosion’ of children’s language, is simply a scapegoat for all of our failings on properly teaching this generation about the English language. Next time, make an effort, and look beyond what people are saying. Maybe try actually asking the students why they write like that? I hope to see better quality journalism next time “Daily Mail”, but glancing at the side column on your website, it seems that I shall be hoping and waiting for a long while.
Victor Mauring, 16
Abu Dhabi, UAE 

Comments

  1. It is very interesting that you blamed parents and teachers of the children's use of text speak, as it is in fact their responsibility and fault for the 'erosion' of children's language. Great use of language! This was very enjoyable to read.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coriolanus and the Theme of Power

Shakespeare develops the theme of power in the play, mainly with the characters of Coriolanus, Volumnia, Aufidius, Menenius, and the Tribunes as representative of different forms of power. The titular character, Coriolanus, is a man from an older form of power, the absolute kind, where rulers did not have to answer to the commoners. He approaches politics the same way he approaches military matters: speaks his mind/heart (i.e. insulting the commoners, but it’s what he genuinely thinks of them), being true to himself, and insulting those he regards as enemies or against Rome (in battle this is the Volsces, but he believes that giving the plebeians a voice is a bad idea). In military, he is successful, because military power is absolute, obey or die type of deal, at least in that time; however, politics requires a surgical approach, and careful consideration of what to say, which the other characters mentioned can do better. Menenius acts as a foil to Coriolanus’ skills, because while h...

Print Advertisement: Nivea Moisturizer

To start off, here's some basic information about the advert. Its target audience is young women, as the main focus of the advert is a young woman, and the product is cosmetic, a product type commonly advertised to this target audience. The cosmetic in question is "Nivea Smooth Milk: Body", a type of moisturizing cream. As the ad is written in English and comes from a German (Western) company, it can be concluded that this advert comes from a Western cultural background. Since Nivea was founded in 1911, it can be inferred that this ad was made in 2011, due to the quote "100 years skin care for life". The ad seems to imply that physical attractiveness is the most important factor in a happy relationship, due to the happy couple featured in the image, and the slogan "For visibily smooth and touchably soft skin" (misspellings came with the ad), which seems to imply to the viewer that moisturizer brought the couple closer together (the image has the...

Summer Blog Posts

Here are both of my Summer blog posts: 1: In Norway, I have visited a cultural history museum in Oslo, and viewed some of the Viking artefacts that they had. They reminded me of Things Fall Apart, specifically the traditional and cultural aspect of the book and Igbo people. Like the Igbo, the Vikings had their own religious faith, featuring famous gods such as Odin and Thor, their own cultural traditions associated with that faith. Furthermore, similarly to the Igbo, the Vikings ended up converting to Christianity. It makes me think that surely there must have been people similar to Okonkwo in views, who would have objected to the Christianisation of Norway. With Norway, Christianisation mainly started under the rule of St. Olav (ruled from 995-1000), with him destroying pagan temples and killing pagans who resisted. The process of Christianisation was continued by following monarchs. I believe that the concept of a radically changing culture and religion, with divisions in societ...