Skip to main content

Letter to the Editor - The Daily Mail

Dear Ms. Laura Clark,
Your article, while raising a few interesting and worrying points, completely missed the mark. Instead of blasting ‘text speak’ and saying that “Youngsters are also in danger of growing up with limited vocabularies because they spend so much of their free time on sites such as Twitter…”, perhaps you should look to the parents and authority figures who should be teaching the children about the English language before blaming technology. As a ‘youngster’ myself, I feel that you shift the blame on to text speak too much, and give it unfair credit. It is also rather insulting to observe the generation raising us, cast their responsibility on to inanimate devices, that they themselves gave us.
The fact is, is that both teachers and parents share a certain responsibility to teach children to do the right thing. Perhaps the staff should have made a better effort in making sure that the children knew to differentiate their writing styles for different contexts and situations. Instead of blaming text speak, which in my opinion (that I’m sure my fellow ‘youngsters’ share as well), is a rather efficient way to write, especially on those tiny phone keyboards. You should realise that the only reason students are using text speak in their school work is that they have not been properly taught by either their parents or teachers, to write properly. Text speak, while at times grammatically incorrect, was simply something originally created out of necessity. Before the era of the iPhone and Galaxy, people often had to limit the amount of text they used, due to bad phone plans and the complexities of having to use the physical phone keyboard. People still knew the correct spellings and the full words, but they made a conscious choice, either to look ‘cool’ or to be efficient. While your complaints about the decrease in grammar and spelling are valid, isn’t it our job to correct them? Instead of raising a child glued to their phone, perhaps parents and teachers could cooperate in making sure the child has a comprehensive education in grammar, writing, and vocabulary. Children using text speak is only a symptom of a wider problem in our society, more specifically the school system and parenting, in my opinion. Even if text speak has truly eroded our language, shouldn’t schools and parents adapt to the change and try to help students retain some basic knowledge of their own language? Is it too much to ask?
I don’t know what age the people you referenced were, but it sounds like both their parents and teachers have failed them, at least in language skills. ‘Hitler was majorly bad’ is a grammatical mistake that even a  3rd grader (native English speaking) would not make. Which leads me to say: What on Earth happened in elementary? Issues like this should be caught and rectified, not left to fester, and written about in some tabloid! The grammatical errors made by the students, in my opinion, was caused by poor language education, one that even a life with the Amish would not improve. To point the finger at text speak as the cause for the so-called ‘erosion’ of children’s language, is simply a scapegoat for all of our failings on properly teaching this generation about the English language. Next time, make an effort, and look beyond what people are saying. Maybe try actually asking the students why they write like that? I hope to see better quality journalism next time “Daily Mail”, but glancing at the side column on your website, it seems that I shall be hoping and waiting for a long while.
Victor Mauring, 16
Abu Dhabi, UAE 

Comments

  1. It is very interesting that you blamed parents and teachers of the children's use of text speak, as it is in fact their responsibility and fault for the 'erosion' of children's language. Great use of language! This was very enjoyable to read.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Okonkwo as a Tragic Hero (Things Fall Apart)

           Taking the cultural context of Things Fall Apart into account, there are a few reasons for why Achebe would characterise Okonkwo using the tragic hero archetype. The character of Okonkwo could be an allegory for the Ibo people as a whole, for example, since throughout the story we see various parallels between Okonkwo’s situation and the situation of the Ibo people and culture. In Part One of the book, both Okonkwo and the Ibo people are well established; Okonkwo has wealth, family, and stability, and the Ibo society is functioning as it has been in the years before. However, in Part Two, we see this begin to unravel, as Okonkwo is exiled, and the colonisers begin to arrive, introducing Christianity, slaughtering a village; bringing great change, and shaking up the cultural stability. At the end of Part Three, we see the full breakdown of both Okonkwo and the old Ibo culture. Okonkwo, of course, kills a court messenger, and then kills himself wh...

What is Shakespeare’s larger purpose in his characterisation of Coriolanus in Act I?

               One of  Act one’s main purposes, in terms of the characterisation of Coriolanus is to showcase the aspects of Coriolanus’ personality and the context that it brings up. Shakespeare portrays Coriolanus as a decisive and effective battlefield commander in the battle scenes, by having Coriolanus give rising and encouraging speeches, “Now put your shields before your hearts, and fight With hearts more proof [strong] than shields” -Act 1 Scene 4, lines 33-34 and in lines 58, where Coriolanus calls on his men to follow him. The fact that Coriolanus is able to capture Corioles and hold his own against Aufidius is contextual proof of his skill as both soldier and commander. Shakespeare also details both the inner and physical strength of Coriolanus, through quotes such as: “The blood I drop is rather physical Than dangerous to me.” -Act 1 Scene 5, lines 20-21 and “…why cease you till you are so?” (context is Coriolanus is asking if th...

Market Analysis: Why we should we invest in online advertising?

            Advertising as we know it is dying. Less and less people are buying and using traditional media (TV, magazines, newspapers, cinemas, radio, etc.), in which the traditional types of advertising are present. The age of television, radio, and paper will eventually come to a close; already the Internet is showing itself to be a dominant player in media, in countries that have developed their internet infrastructure to a satisfactory level. We and other companies have tried to keep up with the rise of the internet, by placing banner ads, pop-ups, and video ads, but people are getting around the ‘inconvenience’ or ‘annoyance’ of these ads via ad blocking software, making our adverts useless (since not enough people view them). However, there may be another, less overt way.             To the average person, having to sit through an advert before viewing a video/article, or view a site littere...